Page 84 - Q&A.indd
P. 84

psychological or economic harm or inspires the reasonable belief on the
            part of the victim that harm will be caused to the victim or any member
            of his/her family. This can include (but is even wider) unreasonably
            following, watching, pursuing a person, unreasonable verbal, electronic
            or other communication and or unreasonable sending of letters, faxes,
            telegrams, packages, text messages and / or e-mails to a person, as well
            as sexual harassment and bullying.

            Under the Act, a victim can relatively informal and cost effectively obtain
            a protection order and enforce such against a perpetrator and have
            such formally served on them. The Act, unlike the Domestic Violence Act,
            does not require  a “domestic relationship” between the complainant
            and the perpetrator.
            In your situation, the single e-mail of your colleague could constitute
            harassment under the  Act and allow you to consider the remedies
            afforded under the Act. It would be prudent to consult your attorney to
            discuss the merits and various options available to you to address the
            conduct of your colleague before you take any steps.


            What rights do performing animals have?

            February 2017

            “With  a circus  in town  again, I  cannot  but wonder  whether
            there is any protection for the animals that have to perform
            in the circus. I’m not saying they are being mistreated, but
            surely their treatment cannot be left only to the discretion of
            the circus owners?”

            A circus is a show that often features live animal performances. Our
            legislature has long recognised that these animals need protection and
            already in 1935 promulgated the Protection of Performing Animals Act
      Litigation   (“PAPA”) to regulate the exhibition and training of performing animals.
            At the beginning of this year amendments to PAPA were published
            which seeks to amend sections 2 and 3 of PAPA which were declared
            constitutionally invalid as they allowed Magistrates to consider and
            issue licenses under PAPA. The amendment act has however not yet
            commenced in order to provide Government the opportunity to establish
            a national licencing authority that will issue licences for the exhibition or
            training of animals.

            In terms of PAPA, any person involved in the exhibition or training of
            animals (such as a circus owner) must obtain a valid license in terms
            of PAPA to do so. To obtain such a licence, very specific guidelines for





            78
   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89